The proposed NZ tax rate increase and its effect on pension transfers – will you accidently become one of the top 2%?

The Labour Party are proposing to raise the top tax bracket in New Zealand to 39% on earnings over $180,000 if re-elected.  On the face of it this appears to be an additional tax aimed at high earners in New Zealand.  The consequences are, in reality far wider – especially for pension transfers.  

Why? Because any UK pension transfer to New Zealand outside the four-year tax exemption period gives rise to declaring a portion of the transfer as taxable income.  This will directly impact two groups of people that are intending to transfer a UK pension:

  1. Those earning over $180,000 as they will now need to pay 39% tax on their taxable income from a pension transfer
  2. Those whose taxable income on a pension transfer will push their taxable income over $180,000 in the year of the pension transfer

So, how likely is it that you might find yourself a top bracket taxpayer because of your pension transfer?  Well, the answer to that question might surprise many people. 

The transfer values of UK defined benefit schemes are currently very high.  For most people small annual pensions are leading to large transfer values, a small annual UK pension of £7,000 could be worth upward of £200,000 as a transfer value.  Then, to compound the problem, the longer you have been in New Zealand the higher the percentage of that figure you will need to declare as taxable income.

Let’s look at the case of Sue who moved to New Zealand 14 years ago as an example.  During Sue’s time in the UK she built up a pension with Barclays Bank, the pension is worth £7,000 a year at retirement and Barclays have provided a transfer value of £215,000.  Sue has a great job in New Zealand and earns $120,000 a year, a high salary but by no means in the top 2%.  Running the numbers for Sue shows the difference that the proposed new 39% bracket will make to her tax in the year of transfer, a whopping extra $6,787 in tax.  The unintended (or maybe not) consequence of the legislation is a large increase on Sue’s tax on transfer of her UK pension. 

Sue’s tax calculations under the proposed tax increase are: 

Transferring before 31 March 2021Transferring after 31 March 2021
Pension transfer value (GBP)215,000 215,000 
Taxable income declaration under schedule method36.06%40.26%
Exchange rate22
Taxable income on pension transfer155,058 173,118 
Current income120,000 120,000 
Total taxable income275,058 293,118 
Amount of transfer that will be taxed at 39%113,118 
Total tax on transfer51,169 63,916 
Additional tax because of 39%6,787 

And it keeps getting worse:

Sue doesn’t have much choice in being able to spread out the transfer to match her income as defined benefit pensions can only be transferred as a lump sum.  Every year Sue doesn’t transfer her pension, the percentage she needs to declare as taxable income escalates until it reaches 100%.  Simply put that means more income taxed at 39% for Sue.

It’s a bad situation for Sue as even though the gains in her scheme are deemed to have been made prior to the introduction of the new tax bracket (her scheme has grown for the 14 years prior to the 31 March 2021), she is having most of them taxed at the new rate.

So, if you are thinking about a transfer now is the time to be reviewing it in light of the potential for an increased tax bill if you leave it too late.  And leaving it too late might be after the election in New Zealand, as we are finding that transfer times have blown out due to COVID-19.  A lack of staff at UK pension schemes, coupled with crippled postal services are meaning that large delays can be experienced in pension transfers.  We would recommend requesting pension transfer forms now if you want to have time to do a reasonable review of your situation and still have time to transfer. 

 


 

it’s time to get reacquainted
with your pension

get a free detailed assessment and report on your
UK pension and what it means to leave it or transfer it

 

Enter your details below to get started

 

 



straightforward and painless

Until now I'd imagined my UK pension funds being locked away behind all manner of firewalls and bureaucratic hurdles to access on retirement. Before committing the one surviving official document of my English OE to the bin - a single page detailing my private pension details - I contacted you out of curiosity. The result feels a little like winning lotto.

Peter W

very stress free

Thank you Cambel for your help and guidance throughout this process in getting my pension transferred (very stress free for me). It is greatly appreciated and I would certainly recommend you and Charter Square to others who are interested in transferring their pension.

David R, New Zealand

You guys rock!

I just wanted to say a great big thank you to you and your team. You are all totally awesome. I received a cheque yesterday from the Prudential to apologise for the ‘recent inconvenience’ that I had experienced. Thank you for doing this for me. You guys rock!

Noelle B, New Zealand

professional, insightful

Charter Square were professional, insightful and a pleasure to work with. They rose to the challenge of consolidating my overseas pensions and bringing them home with minimum fuss for me and maximum effort on their part.

Jens H, New Zealand

thorough, professional and prompt

Very thorough, professional and prompt service from the team at Charter Square. Thanks for making the bewildering world of pension transfers super simple.

Jules T, New Zealand

Best party to deal with

Thank you kindly for keeping in touch with me. For now, I will not be moving my pension. I will however be keeping your details and referring back to you when I wish to pursue. You by far are the best party to deal with, no nonsense, professional and in my opinion genuine. I do sincerely thank you for your advice to date.

GE, New Zealand

Freedom

Securing the freedom to use savings that are actually ours to work with has been stressful in the extreme. While I never planned on giving up there were many times when the current (UK) holder made the whole process seem well beyond my determination and ability. It’s easy to look at the 36 month history of this claim with the benefit of hindsight, but the conclusion is that employing Charter Square in the first instance would have been wise had I been able to anticipate the red-tape that appears to have been deliberately created to stall access.

CP, Auckland