Large return differences between NZ QROPS
After an excellent year in the equities market we have assessed the performance of major QROPS in New Zealand that are portfolio investment entities.
Looking at the average annual returns as at 31 December 2019 we can see large differences in the returns we can see an almost 7.5% absolute return difference between the top and bottom performing schemes.
We wondered if these large differences in returns could be explained by differing risk profiles of investments within the schemes themselves. But analysis of the risk indicators shows that most are middle of the road with 4 being medium to high risk (for more information visit https://www.fma.govt.nz/assets/Guidance/Guidance-note-on-risk-indicators-and-description-of-managed-funds.pdf)
While we appreciate that the results above represent only one year of each schemes performance, it is interesting to see what would happen to $10,000 of investment extrapolated out over five years. This shows the heightened difference in choosing a well performing scheme.
Figure 1. Investment value across NZ QROPS
Source: Charter Square analysis of Disclose filings
NZ superannuation schemes report on a quarterly basis their fund levels, member numbers and the funds performance. You can see this on the Disclose Register a public register run by the New Zealand Companies Office. We took each schemes fund balances for each investment option and the returns of that fund over that last year then weighted the return by the portion of the funds that the investment represents in the total scheme.
Our calculation methodology is shown in the example below.
|Amount invested||Investment weight||Annual investment returns||Weighted annual return|
We do not warrant the performance of the funds nor any New Zealand Superannuation Scheme. Past performance is no predictor of future performance. The information provided has been calculated using publicly available information, we do not warrant the accuracy of the underlying data. Any decisions made based on this data are the sole responsibility of the person making the decision and Charter Square Services Limited takes no responsibility for those decisions.
it’s time to get reacquainted
with your pension
get a free detailed assessment and report on your
UK pension and what it means to leave it or transfer it
straightforward and painless
Until now I'd imagined my UK pension funds being locked away behind all manner of firewalls and bureaucratic hurdles to access on retirement. Before committing the one surviving official document of my English OE to the bin - a single page detailing my private pension details - I contacted you out of curiosity. The result feels a little like winning lotto.
very stress free
Thank you Cambel for your help and guidance throughout this process in getting my pension transferred (very stress free for me). It is greatly appreciated and I would certainly recommend you and Charter Square to others who are interested in transferring their pension.
You guys rock!
I just wanted to say a great big thank you to you and your team. You are all totally awesome. I received a cheque yesterday from the Prudential to apologise for the ‘recent inconvenience’ that I had experienced. Thank you for doing this for me. You guys rock!
Charter Square were professional, insightful and a pleasure to work with. They rose to the challenge of consolidating my overseas pensions and bringing them home with minimum fuss for me and maximum effort on their part.
thorough, professional and prompt
Very thorough, professional and prompt service from the team at Charter Square. Thanks for making the bewildering world of pension transfers super simple.
Best party to deal with
Thank you kindly for keeping in touch with me. For now, I will not be moving my pension. I will however be keeping your details and referring back to you when I wish to pursue. You by far are the best party to deal with, no nonsense, professional and in my opinion genuine. I do sincerely thank you for your advice to date.
Securing the freedom to use savings that are actually ours to work with has been stressful in the extreme. While I never planned on giving up there were many times when the current (UK) holder made the whole process seem well beyond my determination and ability. It’s easy to look at the 36 month history of this claim with the benefit of hindsight, but the conclusion is that employing Charter Square in the first instance would have been wise had I been able to anticipate the red-tape that appears to have been deliberately created to stall access.